The best implementation, IMHO, would be a way to integrate between Logos and various mind mapping programs. By definition, mindmapping is very unique to the user and the situation. There are many other mind mapping packages out there and they all have different strengths. I am an avid mind mapper having used hand drawn techniques, Compendium, and now Mindmanager since version 7. I don't think it makes sense to have the Logos team spend time on something that is already well done in other programs. The text in green highlight shows how to get a student into Level 2 or even Level 3 thinking.DAB The pinkish text shows how John the Baptist and Jesus are similar, and the the text attached to each individual shows differences. Personally I have been using these thinking maps in my own personal biblical studies. The following is an example of a Comparison and Contrast (one of the 8 basic cognitive processes) Thinking Map. It is important to be able to teach all types of students from advanced to novice about the Bible. classes, and they have been extremely helpful in getting the students to process information in these very "content-oriented" subject areas. I have been using these thinking maps in my World History and Amer. They use a simpler process that involve 8 basic cognitive processes tied to only 8 different graphic organizers that help students learn. I have been trained by a company called "Thinking Maps" that is fairly small. Some of the "mind maps" in this thread are pretty complicated. Here is my take on this topic as a High School teacher. I agree, even if we could just download a graphic into Notes (like a JPEG file). This is the 1st time I have viewed this thread.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |